Bug#414002: [gs-common] Retag FTBS
Hi Bastien,
Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> severity 414002 serious
> reassign 414002 ghostscript
> found 414002 8.71~dfsg2-9
> tags 414002 + confirmed
> tags 412584 + confirmed
> affects 412584 texlive-pstricks
> thanks
>
> I can confirm this bugs. Raise to grave due to FTBFS texlive-pstricks
Sorry I jumped the gun on merging #414002 with #618530. Let's see...
$ wget http://mirror.ctan.org/graphics/pstricks/contrib/pst-geo.zip
$ unzip pst-geo.zip
$ mkdir pst-geo/testcase && cd pst-geo/testcase
$ cat <<\EOF >test.tex
\documentclass[letterpaper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{pstricks}
\usepackage{pst-map2dII}
\begin{document}
\psset{xunit=0.70,yunit=0.70, path=../dataII}
\begin{pspicture*}(-9,-4)(10,9)
\WorldMapII[maillage=false,all=true,level=5,borders=false,linewidth=0.01\pslinewidth,linecolor=gray]
\end{pspicture*}
\end{document}
EOF
$ latex test.tex
$ dvips test.dvi
$ gs -dSAFER test.ps
Result:
| GPL Ghostscript 9.04 (2011-08-05)
| Copyright (C) 2011 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved.
| This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details.
| Error: /invalidfileaccess in --run--
| Operand stack:
| (../dataII/europe-cil.dat) (r)
| Execution stack:
| %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1910 1 3 %oparray_pop 1909 1 3 %oparray_pop 1893 1 3 %oparray_pop 1787 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- %errorexec_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- 1910 1 6 %oparray_pop --nostringval--
| Dictionary stack:
| --dict:1157/1684(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:85/200(L)-- --dict:180/300(L)-- --dict:38/200(L)-- --dict:130/200(L)--
| Current allocation mode is local
| Last OS error: 2
| Current file position is 101753
| GPL Ghostscript 9.04: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
Arnout Boelens wrote:
> If I move everything from ../dataII to ./data (and remove the
> \psset{path=../dataII}) it works here.
But I do _not_ find that to be the case here. So I imagine something
has changed, and that the modern incarnation of this bug has the same
cause as bug#618530 after all.
Am I understanding correctly? What package does this prevent from
building from source?
Thanks,
Jonathan
Reply to: