Hi Markus, On 11-04-23 at 02:41pm, Markus Steinborn wrote: > please note that I am not using debian. But that bug is that type of > bugs people frequently report to me as upstream GNU gv maintainer. > > I've taken redhat's ghostscript 9.02 package (you see for > maintaining GNU gv I need an up to date ghostscript) and got the > same bug as reported in this bug. > > Then I applied patch 12380 from ghostscript's subversion repository > and all is working well, the bug appears to be fixed. I've attached > the patch taken from subversion to this bug report. > > Finally a link to the upstream bug report: > http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689734 Thanks a lot for your bugreport. It is dearly appreciated! A fix have been prepared (along with a few other severe bugfixes) and should enter Debian unstable within a few hours - and if all goes well then enter Debian testing after 10 days. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature