On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:51:50PM +0100, fabian@greffrath.com wrote:
I disagree with that approach: I consider it a Best Practice(tm) to favor true source over indirection like redistribution bia Ghostscript.Jonas, AFAICT URW++ made these fonts available by handing them over to the ghostscript project, i.e. there has never been a "true source" tarball released by URW++ itself (at least this is how I understand it). Ghostscript made these fonts available e.g. here http://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ghost/fonts/ before they modified them and integrated them into their own release tarballs.
Seems to me you just provided its most true source, then :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature