[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#616024: ghostscript: please provide debugging package



Le Wednesday 2 March 2011 12:40:09 Jonas Smedegaard, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:39:50PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >I'm experiencing segfaults with ghostscript (using it from epstopdf or
> >directly on eps files) and would like to provide a meaningful backtrace.
> >But as there's no -dbg package that means I have to rebuild it
> >completely with -g and -O0. It'd be nice to have the debugging symbols
> >somewhere.
> 
> Help much appreciated here.
> 
> I do understand that a -dbg package is essentially a rebuild without
> optimizations and without stripping.  But I have no expecience in this,
> so could use a pointer to some guidelines of whatminimal pieces are
> needed to extract and include in that -dbg package and where to put it
> (I believe I saw somewhere that there's a trick of putting -dbg libs in
> a subdir which makes it extend (not replace) the normal package and get
> used if available).
> 
> 
>   - Jonas

AFAIK, providing debugging symbols is just a matter of 

1) building with "-g -O2" (policy defaults)
2) stripping the symbols without throwing them away (dh_strip has an --dbg-
package option therefor).

CDBS (which I don't know) has a "Debug package support" entry in its 
documentation, which seems to indicate that adding a "ghostscript-dbg" package 
in debian/control is sufficient.

/me tries…

-- 
Didier Raboud, proud Debian Developer.
CH-1020 Renens
odyx@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: