Bug#610960: CVE-2010-4267: Buffer overflow

To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <muehlenhoff@univention.de>, 610960@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#610960: CVE-2010-4267: Buffer overflow
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:34:03 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 1295904843.2202.694.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
Reply-to: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 610960@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110124123219.8615.2818.reportbug@irma.knut.univention.de>
References: <[🔎] 20110124123219.8615.2818.reportbug@irma.knut.univention.de>

user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
usertag 610960 + squeeze-can-defer
tag 610960 + squeeze-ignore
thanks

On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 13:32 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662740 for
> the description and a patch by Sebastian Krahmer.
> 
> A DSA is in preparation, for Squeeze please upload the isolated
> security fix with urgency=high and ask for an unblock on
> debian-release@lists.debian.org

This can be fixed after release if necessary; tagging as not a blocker.

Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#610960: CVE-2010-4267: Buffer overflow
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

References:
- Bug#610960: CVE-2010-4267: Buffer overflow
  - From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <muehlenhoff@univention.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Provide libijs packages as a binary package of Ghostscript?
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#610960: CVE-2010-4267: Buffer overflow
Previous by thread: Bug#610960: CVE-2010-4267: Buffer overflow
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#610960: CVE-2010-4267: Buffer overflow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread