Bug#579602: escputil segfaults when attempting to get ink level.
Package: escputil
Version: 5.2.4-1
Severity: normal
After upgrading to 5.2.4-1, attempts to read ink level result in a
segmentation violation.
# escputil -r /dev/usb/lp0 -i
Escputil version 5.2.4, Copyright (C) 2000-2006 Robert Krawitz
Escputil comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type 'escputil -l'
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type 'escputil -l' for details.
Unknown printer Stylus CX3900!
Segmentation fault
If I downgrade to the version in stable (5.0.2-4) it works perfectly.
I tried other options too:
escputil -d -- works
escputil -s -- segfaults
Gdb shows this backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff7bcb4f8 in stp_printer_get_defaults ()
from /usr/lib/libgutenprint.so.2
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7bcb4f8 in stp_printer_get_defaults ()
from /usr/lib/libgutenprint.so.2
#1 0x000000000040da12 in ?? ()
#2 0x000000000041087d in ?? ()
#3 0x00007ffff6f53abd in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
#4 0x0000000000401ca9 in ?? ()
#5 0x00007fffffffea18 in ?? ()
#6 0x000000000000001c in ?? ()
#7 0x0000000000000004 in ?? ()
#8 0x00007fffffffec88 in ?? ()
#9 0x00007fffffffec9a in ?? ()
#10 0x00007fffffffec9d in ?? ()
#11 0x00007fffffffecaa in ?? ()
#12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.34-rc5 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages escputil depends on:
ii libc6 2.10.2-7 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libgutenprint2 5.2.4-1 runtime for the Gutenprint printer
ii libncurses5 5.7+20100313-2 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libreadline5 5.2-7 GNU readline and history libraries
escputil recommends no packages.
Versions of packages escputil suggests:
pn gutenprint-locales <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
Reply to: