[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#365301: marked as done (Discrepancy between CUPS lpr command and Users Manual)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:07:56 +0200
with message-id <AANLkTinkqMpG5Wve7D1JLvE8Rw+njjGiyRvSExH06x_g@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line [Debian QA] please review your old bug reports against CUPS
has caused the Debian Bug report #365301,
regarding Discrepancy between CUPS lpr command and Users Manual
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
365301: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365301
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.1.23-12

	This report is for the version of cupsys currently installed by
etch.
	The version installed by sarge behaves differently.

	The Software Users Manual says the lpr command has the same -o
options as the lp command.  For the past several years, that was true.
	Starting with this version, the lpr command rejects the -o argument
as a syntax error.
	The lpr man page agrees with this behavior.  For the version
installed by sarge, the -o option worked on lpr, but the man page didn't
show it.
	It appears that CUPS has reverted the lpr command syntax to emulate
the old BSD lpr command, but has not updated the Users Manual to reflect
this change.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Hi,

This bug is quite old and I didn't get any answer from my previous mail.
So, I'm closing this bug report.
If the problem still occurs, please, feel free to reopen it.

Thanks,

Jean

--- End Message ---
Reply to: