[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#389000: Fwd: Accepted hplip 2.7.10-2 (source i386 all)



Hello,

I just leave my printer (hp840) of the cave to make this test ...
Since I also changed my motherboard and I am now in
debian etch with the kernel of etch backport.

Now everything works fine, no more bugs ... thank you !

Here the version i use now :

Package: hplip
Version: 1.6.10-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
 APT prefers stable
 APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages hplip depends on:
ii  adduser                    3.102         Add and remove users and groups
ii  coreutils                  5.97-5.3      The GNU core utilities
ii cupsys 1.2.7-4etch1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii hplip-data 1.6.10-3 HP Linux Printing and Imaging - da
ii  libc6                      2.6.1-1       GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libcupsys2 1.2.7-4etch1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) -
ii  libgcc1                    1:4.2.1-5     GCC support library
ii libsnmp9 5.2.3-7 NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii  libssl0.9.8                0.9.8c-4etch1 SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++6                 4.2.1-5       The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-5 userspace USB programming library ii lsb-base 3.1-23.2etch1 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii python 2.4.4-2 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-qt3                 3.16-1.2      Qt3 bindings for Python
ii python-support 0.5.6 automated rebuilding support for p

Versions of packages hplip recommends:
ii cupsys-client 1.2.7-4etch1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii hpijs 2.6.10+1.6.10-3 HP Linux Printing and Imaging - gs ii hpijs-ppds 2.6.10+1.6.10-3 HP Linux Printing and Imaging - HP ii linuxprinting.org-ppds 20061031-1 linuxprinting.org printer support ii python-reportlab 2.0dfsg-1 ReportLab library to create PDF do


Guy





Reply to: