Bug#361925: Reason for another [v]snprintf implementation?
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:32:05AM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
> Sometime ago, I looked at the bug in common/lpd_jobs.c, but was unable
> to figure out what semantics were intended. If the semantics intended
> were a concatenation of the lines, I believe there is a function which
> does that. Alternately, you could just remove -Werror.
I'm trying to get them to release it.
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
http://www.debian.org/ Debian GNU/Linux, software should be Free
Reply to: