Bug#431391: Recommends field not binNMU-proof
Package: libgutenprintui2-1
Version: 5.0.1-1
Severity: normal
Today, when aptitude wanted to upgrade libgutenprintui2-1 to its
more recent binNMU, it wanted to remove the gutenprint-locales
package, as this one was automatically installed to satisfy the
Recommends: gutenprint-locales (>= 5.0.1-1)
field. As the newer, binNMUed package does have an unsatisfiable
Recommends: gutenprint-locales (>= 5.0.1-1+b1)
dependency, aptitude simply removes the gutenprint-locale package, as
it is not needed anymore. A simple
Recommends: gutenprint-locales (>= ${source:Upstream-Version})
should do the trick.
Regards,
Vincent Fourmond
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages libgutenprintui2-1 depends on:
ii libatk1.0-0 1.18.0-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libcairo2 1.4.10-1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii libfontconfig1 2.4.2-1.2 generic font configuration library
ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.12-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.10.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libgutenprint2 5.0.1-1 runtime for the Gutenprint printer
ii libpango1.0-0 1.16.4-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-7 X11 client-side library
ii libxcursor1 1:1.1.8-2 X cursor management library
ii libxext6 1:1.0.3-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxfixes3 1:4.0.3-2 X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio
ii libxi6 1:1.0.1-4 X11 Input extension library
ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.2-1 X11 Xinerama extension library
ii libxrandr2 2:1.2.1-1 X11 RandR extension library
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.2-1 X Rendering Extension client libra
Versions of packages libgutenprintui2-1 recommends:
ii gutenprint-locales 5.0.1-1 locale data files for Gutenprint
-- no debconf information
Reply to: