Bug#361925: Reason for another [v]snprintf implementation?
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:40:44PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
> Is there a particular reason that we need this vsnprintf implementation?
> Could we just use the one included in libc?
There may of been a reason. Upstream has now changed and I do know
they were looking into lots of things, the *sprintf functions included.
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
http://www.debian.org/ Debian GNU/Linux, software should be Free
Reply to: