Bug#396289: Possibly fixed in SVN?

To: 396289@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#396289: Possibly fixed in SVN?
From: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@ucwb.org.au>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 07:52:18 +0930
Message-id: <1178058138.3739.10.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au>
Reply-to: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@ucwb.org.au>, 396289@bugs.debian.org

Hi,

I got another response on the ghostscript bugzilla that some similar
pattern allocation errors were fixed post version 8.56 in svn.

They've asked if I can re-test with some revision greater than 7861 -
Any chance of getting a package of current svn HEAD for me to re-test?

Thanks,
Kevin.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#396289: Possibly fixed in SVN?
  - From: Masayuki Hatta <mhatta@grad.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Bug#82004: gc() would not be required.
Next by Date: Bug#421899: cupsys: New upstream version available
Previous by thread: Bug#82004: gc() would not be required.
Next by thread: Bug#396289: Possibly fixed in SVN?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread