[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#393271: statoverride warning not useful



Hi,

I probably did what you suggested - uninstalled and reinstalled. Or I
did something else. Anyway, it works now. I don't recall having to do anything
weird with apt. I'm pretty sure hplip finished configuring.

I still think the error message could be improved.

On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:00:38AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> > Package: hplip
> > Version: 1.6.7-2
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > When I run /etc/init.d/hplip, it says
> > 
> >   You are missing a dpkg-statoverride on /var/run/hplip.  Fix it, otherwise you risk silent breakage on upgrades.
> > 
> > I think that the warning would be much more useful if it explained
> 
> It would, but it is there so that I get bug reports instead of leaving
> people wondering what is broken.  Anyway, how did you break the package
> enough that it gave you that warning?  Do you recall if you had to do
> anything weird in the last apt runs?  Did hplip finish configuring properly?
> 
> Anyway, the fix is simple: remove hplip and install it again.  It will fix
> itself, as long as your system is in good shape enough for dpkg to work.
> 
> > pn  python                       <none>      (no description available)
> > pn  python-qt3                   <none>      (no description available)
> > pn  python-support               <none>      (no description available)
> 
> You are doing something weird when installing packages.  What?
> 
> > Versions of packages hplip recommends:
> > pn  hpijs                         <none>     (no description available)
> > pn  hpijs-ppds | linuxprinting.or <none>     (no description available)
> 
> You also need the above packages unless you *really* know better.
> 
> -- 
>   "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
>   them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
>   where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
>   Henrique Holschuh
> 




Reply to: