[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#382250: marked as done (gs-esp doesn't print german umlauts)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:32:11 -0700
with message-id <E1GEij5-0000zF-R4@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#382250: fixed in gs-esp 8.15.2.dfsg.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: gs-esp
Version: 8.15.2.dfsg.1-2

I updated gs-esp from 8.15.1.dfsg.1.1 to 8.15.2.dfsg.1-2. After that I 
discovered printing problems when using german umlauts in fonts supplied 
through msttcorefonts. I saw the same behaviour when looking at the 
postscript-files with gv.

I had a look at system configuration and all the encoding files but I couldn't 
find any apparent configuration error. After downgrading gs-esp everything 
works well again. 

Find attached a small postscript-File with an example. You may not have a 
german setup ;)

The dependencies have the following versions:

gs-common: 0.3.9
libfontconfig: 2.3.2-7
libc6; 2.3.6-6
libcupsimage2: 1.2.2-1
libcupsys2: 1.2.2-1
libgnutls13: 1.4.1-1
libice6: 1.0.0-2
libjpeg62: 6b-10
libpaper1: 1.1.14-3
libpng12-0: 1.2.8rel-5
libsm6: 1.0.0-3
libstdc++: 4.1.0-1
libtiff4: 3.7.1-3
libx11-6: 2:1.0.0-6
libxext6: 1:1.0.0-3
libxt6: 1:1.0.0-3
zliblg: 1:1.2.3-9

The system is based on Debian Unstable running kernel 2.6.17 on a Sempron 
2800+

Attachment: ps.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: gs-esp
Source-Version: 8.15.2.dfsg.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gs-esp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gs-esp_8.15.2.dfsg.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gs-esp/gs-esp_8.15.2.dfsg.1-2.diff.gz
gs-esp_8.15.2.dfsg.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gs-esp/gs-esp_8.15.2.dfsg.1-2.dsc
gs-esp_8.15.2.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gs-esp/gs-esp_8.15.2.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 382250@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org> (supplier of updated gs-esp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:33:07 +0900
Source: gs-esp
Binary: gs-esp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 8.15.2.dfsg.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <mhatta@debian.org>
Changed-By: Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>
Description: 
 gs-esp     - The Ghostscript PostScript interpreter - ESP version
Closes: 381386 382250
Changes: 
 gs-esp (8.15.2.dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [Kenshi Muto]
   * gs-cjk-resource still needs for CJK people.
     Revert a dependency.
   * Apply revert patch 166:164. Upsream CJK patch broke umlaute.
     (closes: #381386, #382250)
Files: 
 9f493570797b85ce6320afb639423f09 851 text optional gs-esp_8.15.2.dfsg.1-2.dsc
 fdfa0996ea0691a35c9004ad6d64416d 166912 text optional gs-esp_8.15.2.dfsg.1-2.diff.gz
 6687cb5892ff34120ae5080cfdfeb884 3000740 text optional gs-esp_8.15.2.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkToGr8ACgkQQKW+7XLQPLFB9QCgu5sBd9dACm2iK+csUPqgOyv5
9wQAnjALRDRueRjrl1pf90quzxDjgUlY
=JlRZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: