Bug#311774: lprng: Fails to print to localhost when named pipe is missing
>>>>> "CS" == Craig Small <csmall@enc.com.au> writes:
CS> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:30:32AM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
>> No :force_localhost@ don't work! It don't give the desired effect. It
>> prints directly, without using the local spool. I want to print via
>> the spool.
CS> You want to print via a non-existent (to the chroot) spool, via a
CS> non-exisitent (to the chroot) socket and then, wonder why it doesn't
CS> work.
No, I want to print via the existing non-chroot LPD from the chroot,
and I want to do it via the existing TCP socket in the non
chroot. Printing via this LPD from other hosts work fine, via the TCP
socket. It is *only* from a local chroot it doesn't work, because
lpr tries to be "smart" and use a local socket instead of the TCP
socket.
CS> Did you try it, did you try turning off force_localhost inside the
CS> printcap within the chroot?
Yes!
/ Anders
Reply to: