[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#347264: Incorrect *Manufacturer string

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Pascal De Vuyst wrote:
> For the above reasons hplip-ppd should provide HPLIP PPDs and
> foomatic-filters-ppds should not.

HPLIP provides *HP* PPDs.  This includes all hpijs ones, and all postscript
ones.  I am not about to deal with the mess of shipping a different set of
PPDs than upstream (I can deal with shipping all, or shipping none).  The
reason for this is user confusion, which I am wary of increasing.

> We should not remove all HP PPDs from packages providing PPDs since there
> are other binary gs drivers (e.g. pcl3) for use with HP printers where PPDs
> are provided by foomatic-filter-ppds.

You'll have to verify if HPLIP is not providing those... If they are
supported by HP, it probably does.

> Roger Leigh has a good point here.
> HPLIP PPDs already use the above Foomatic approach so that's no problem.

Only in CVS, I didn't upload the packages not screwing up with the
Manufacturer's field yet.

> So if PPDs are named e.g. "HP-DeskJet_520-hpijs.ppd.gz" and are located in

As I said, there are ppds for other drivers than hpijs, including pure

> I think Debian should lead the way here by providing unified naming for PPDs
> which opens possibilities for GUI tools that are currently not possible.
> Perhaps a bug should be filed against foomatic-db to get this changed 
> upstream.

It *will* have to be changed upstream if you want to change names. But only
the case is weird in HP's case, and that I can deal with.

  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Reply to: