Bug#342045: marked as done (hplip package installation process defect)
Your message dated Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:51:44 -0200
with message-id <20051205115144.GA12268@khazad-dum.debian.net>
and subject line Bug#342045: hplip package installation process defect
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2005 22:26:36 +0000
>From bnicodemus@comcast.net Sun Dec 04 14:26:36 2005
Return-path: <bnicodemus@comcast.net>
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net ([63.240.77.82])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ej2JX-00080p-Vf
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:26:36 -0800
Received: from smailcenter59.comcast.net ([204.127.205.159])
by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP
id <2005120422260401200lt65re>; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 22:26:04 +0000
Received: from [68.42.0.45] by smailcenter59.comcast.net;
Sun, 04 Dec 2005 22:26:03 +0000
From: bnicodemus@comcast.net
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: hplip package installation process defect
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 22:26:03 +0000
Message-Id: <[🔎] 120420052226.24856.43936CFB00091E300000611822070032019C9A030A0B010C07020D@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Dec 17 2004)
X-Authenticated-Sender: Ym5pY29kZW11c0Bjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA==
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: hplip
Version: 0.9.5-2ubuntu2
Overview: HP DJ855 printer installation on Ubuntu v5.10 did not work when using CUPS. Traced issue to hplip and cupsys startup sequence issues. Believe Ubuntu may source hplip package from Debian so want to share this defect with Debian development team. I will notify Ubuntu dev team separately.
Details: Installed both CUPS and hplip. In troubleshooting the printing problem, I found the following document on my system:
/usr/share/doc/hplip/hplip_readme,html
This document is authored by HP. In section 6, Installation, there is a Caveats subsection. Caveat #5 states "The HPLIP startup script must be executed before the CUPS startup script at boot time".
To confirm this was indeed the actual configuration, I opened the /etc/rc2.d folder on my machine where I found the following 2 init scripts:
S19cupsys
S19hplip
These were default settings resulting from the standard CUPS installation process and the standard hplip installation process.
In a normal boot sequence, S19hplip will load *subsequent* to S19cupsys, rather than *prior* to S19cupsys, resulting in unknown problems.
Recommended Action: Confirm with HP (david_suffield@hp.com) that the load process dependency identified in the README file is still valid. If so, modify hplip installation package to install a file into the /etc/rc2.d folder named S18hplip, rather than S19hplip.
If I can be of any assistance or provide additional information, please feel free to contact me.
thanks,
Blair
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 342045-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2005 11:51:52 +0000
>From hmh@debian.org Mon Dec 05 03:51:52 2005
Return-path: <hmh@debian.org>
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EjEsn-0003L4-Vq
for 342045-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:51:50 -0800
Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149])
by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC990D1F06F;
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:51:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151])
by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 05 Dec 2005 06:51:48 -0500
X-Sasl-enc: KuY6hUmeAkvtZVkV+OybYjMHRuibApKcDftdmOINMbLo 1133783508
Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net (c91f9ed3.cps.virtua.com.br [201.31.158.211])
by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC4557145C;
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:51:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98EB20320E;
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:51:44 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (khazad-dum.debian.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 11960-02-3; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:51:44 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3889A2004D3; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:51:44 -0200 (BRST)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:51:44 -0200
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
To: bnicodemus@comcast.net, 342045-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#342045: hplip package installation process defect
Message-ID: <20051205115144.GA12268@khazad-dum.debian.net>
References: <[🔎] 120420052226.24856.43936CFB00091E300000611822070032019C9A030A0B010C07020D@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 120420052226.24856.43936CFB00091E300000611822070032019C9A030A0B010C07020D@comcast.net>
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at khazad-dum.debian.net
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005, bnicodemus@comcast.net wrote:
> Package: hplip
> Version: 0.9.5-2ubuntu2
First things first: Debian is not Ubuntu, please report bugs of Ubuntu
packages to the Ubuntu bug tracking system. They will report back to Debian
if the bug is also present in Debian packages.
That said, I have verified that the Debian packages in unstable are NOT
subject to the above bug, as cupsys installs at sequence 20 in Debian.
Also, I have verified that the cupsys/hplip load order is relatively
unimportant in the current packages (as it really should be, hplip reloads
cups when it is started in Debian). You could even have done this yourself.
Just stop both services, start CUPS, start hplip, and try printing. All
badness you will get is a message in the CUPS logs that can be ignored.
I am closing this bug.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: