Re: OldWorld ROM Macintoshes
On Sun, 2025-09-07 at 13:16 -0600, Stan Johnson wrote:
> On 9/5/25 6:27 PM, Cedar Maxwell wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > Would you send your xorg.conf, etc., please? I can only seem to
> > get
> > Xorg to launch by passing in video=ofonly. I can't get it to work
> > with
> > fbdev either.
> > ...
>
>
> I've been testing kernels on my Wallstreet using a current Gentoo
> distribution.
>
> I noticed this morning that mainline kernel v6.1, compiled using the
> attached .config file, works in Gentoo, but not in Debian SID.
>
> In Debian, I can see the X11 login screen, but the keyboard and mouse
> don't respond. In Gentoo, everything works as expected.
>
> In Debian SID, I'm using Xfce, sysvinit-core instead of systemd, and
> wdm
> instead of lightdm.
>
> In Gentoo, I noticed elogind was installed; elogind was not installed
> in
> Debian. Using "apt-get install elogind" to install elogind, systemd
> was
> removed, as well as xserver-org and some X11-related files, so of
> course
> X11 doesn't work at all now, and I'll need to restore from a backup.
> Interestingly, I'm not having similar issues with PB Lombard or
> Pismo.
>
> My BootX configuration is as follows (working X11 in 6.1.0 in
> Gentoo):
> Kernel: vmlinux-6.1.0-pmac (custom kernel, no modules)
> Boot Device: /dev/sda13 (Gentoo partition)
> More kernel arguments: video=atyfb:vmode:14,cmode:32,mclk:71
> No video driver: checked
> Options:
> Force SCSI ON: checked
> Force video settings: checked
> Use specified RAM disk: not checked
Checking "No video driver" appears to pass in video=ofonly. How is
your performance with this configuration? Mine is borderline unusable.
mclk:71 makes everything green.
>
> I'll probably end up using whatever .config file the developer who
> investigates the possible kernel regressions recommends.
>
> I'm not using an xorg.conf file in either Debian SID or Gentoo (I
> haven't needed to use an xorg.conf file since Debian 7.8 in Sparc64).
>
> For now I'll be sticking with Gentoo for these particular kernel
> regression tests.
Reply to: