Re: Bug#996724: ruby3.0: FTBFS on ppc64el: Segmentation fault
On 10/18/21 13:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I don't think we are on the right track here. I need to read the failing
> test correctly. this "test case" alone is bogus, as
>
> ruby -e 'END {Process.kill :SEGV, $$}'
>
> is _expected_ to segfault, i.e. the process is sending a SEGV signal to
> itself. This test case is not complete.
It might be an idea to look at the Fedora package:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/blob/rawhide/f/ruby.spec
It has a number of patches against 3.x:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/tree/rawhide
It builds fine on ppc64el:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1801321
OTOH, ruby3.0 builds fine in openSUSE Factory on ppc64el, but they're still at
version 3.0.1, so it might be an issue that will only show with 3.0.2?
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/ruby3.0
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Reply to: