[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#942022: librsvg: FTBFS on ppc64el: panicked at 'assertion failed: bounds.x1 >= bounds.x0', rsvg_internals/src/surface_utils/iterators.rs:36:9



Source: librsvg
Version: 2.44.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=librsvg&arch=ppc64el&ver=2.44.15-1&stamp=1570485722&raw=0
> ERROR: rsvg-test
> ================
>
> thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'assertion failed: bounds.x1 >= bounds.x0', rsvg_internals/src/surface_utils/iterators.rs:36:9
> note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace.
> fatal runtime error: failed to initiate panic, error 3566158048
> Aborted
> # random seed: R02S0f654ed6558162595d23868d46d7f767
> # GLib-GIO-DEBUG: _g_io_module_get_default: Found default implementation local (GLocalVfs) for ?gio-vfs?
> 1..189
> # Start of rsvg-test tests
> # Start of reftests tests
> # Storing test result image at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/tests/output/css-import-out.png
> ok 1 /rsvg-test/reftests/css-import.svg
> PASS: rsvg-test 1 /rsvg-test/reftests/css-import.svg
> # Storing test result image at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/tests/output/duplicate-id-out.png
> ok 2 /rsvg-test/reftests/duplicate-id.svg
> PASS: rsvg-test 2 /rsvg-test/reftests/duplicate-id.svg
> # Storing test result image at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/tests/output/filter-component-transfer-from-reference-page-out.png
> # 856 pixels differ (with maximum difference of 255) from reference image
>
> # Storing test result image at /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/tests/output/filter-component-transfer-from-reference-page-diff.png
> not ok 3 /rsvg-test/reftests/filter-component-transfer-from-reference-page.svg
> FAIL: rsvg-test 3 /rsvg-test/reftests/filter-component-transfer-from-reference-page.svg
> ERROR: rsvg-test - too few tests run (expected 189, got 3)
> ERROR: rsvg-test - exited with status 134 (terminated by signal 6?)

I've retried this build to see whether the panic is reproducible. If not,
we can maybe downgrade this to important.

    smcv


Reply to: