[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FTBFS on ppc64el

On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 16:55 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:

> Paul and Helmut had some suggestions about improving this tool even
> better.
> Paul, Helmut, would you mind sharing them in this public email?

I had a few thoughts:

If "1 other architecture" is the same for each package in the set,
replace it with the name of that architecture:

1 packages are failing on amd64 and i386

Add a title attribute on each instance of undefined architectures:

1 packages are failing on amd64 and <span title="i386 armel">2 other

Add the concept of architecture groups, for example: 

 * FTBFS on armhf and all 32-bit architectures.
 * FTBFS on armhf and all 32-bit ARM architectures.
 * FTBFS on ppc64el and all 64-bit POWER architectures.

Advertise this via the debian-ports alias and DevNews. The alias spams
all the architecture-specific mailing lists. DevNews goes to d-d-a:




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: