On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 16:55 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote: > Paul and Helmut had some suggestions about improving this tool even > better. > > Paul, Helmut, would you mind sharing them in this public email? I had a few thoughts: If "1 other architecture" is the same for each package in the set, just replace it with the name of that architecture: 1 packages are failing on amd64 and i386 Add a title attribute on each instance of undefined architectures: 1 packages are failing on amd64 and <span title="i386 armel">2 other architectures</span> Add the concept of architecture groups, for example: * FTBFS on armhf and all 32-bit architectures. * FTBFS on armhf and all 32-bit ARM architectures. * FTBFS on ppc64el and all 64-bit POWER architectures. Advertise this via the debian-ports alias and DevNews. The alias spams all the architecture-specific mailing lists. DevNews goes to d-d-a: https://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part