Re: Fixing buildd issues on ppc64el
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:26:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
> > I'd like to help fixing issues found during buildd of packages on ppc64el :
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=ppc64el&suite=sid
>
> Thanks, help is welcomed. You might have seen there are two categories,
> Build-Attempted and Failed. The first one is where packages which fails
> to build land. It can be moved to Failed by a DD having access to
> wanna-build with a comment.
Now that we have debian-installer working, I have installed a VM with
it and tried to determine which packages are still missing to setup a
VM with the standard DSA packages using the Debian archive. I therefore
tried to install the various meta-packages in order to find which
packages are missing in the Debian archive. Here is the list below,
based on the source package name, with an explanation why they are not
available:
bacula #758125 ftbfs (libtool)
bzr #760054 ftbfs (non ppc64el specific) #760054
deborphan #735010 ftbfs (libtool)
emacs23 #749530 build-dep on libotf, which ftbfs (libtool)
git #727295 build-dep indirectly on exiv2, which ftbfs (libtool)
grub2 need a cross-compiler or patches
klibc #749060 some binaries segfault
mutt #752831 build-dep on gpgme1.0 which ftbfs (libtool)
powerpc-utils #738140 arch not in list
subversion #727295 build-dep indirectly on exiv2, which ftbfs (libtool)
tcsh testsuite failure
ulogd2 #734029 build-dep on libnetfilter-acct, which ftbfs (libtool)
It would be a good idea to work on these packages in priority.
Thanks,
Aurelien
[1] http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ppc64el/daily/netboot/
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: