[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian/ppc64el feasiability to become an official architecture

Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> (2014-07-25):
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:48:13PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> > Not in debian proper but it is on debian-ports.org and it appears to
> > be pretty healthy.
> Hmm, not listed under the official nor unofficial debian ports, while
> ppc64el is.
> https://www.debian.org/ports/
> ppc64el listed, ppc64 is not.

I'm not sure what your point is.

Maybe “crazy how ppc64 people got interested in getting their packages
built as opposed to getting debian.org ports page updated”? Anyway, if
you want to know about the port, see the wiki[1], or debian-ports buildd
stats[2], or whatever else.

 1. https://wiki.debian.org/PPC64
 2. http://buildd.debian-ports.org/stats/?arch=ppc64

Now, if you've got answers to peter's questions…


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: