Re: Bug#667047: [Debian Sid] unmet dependencies
> None. There is none for 3.5. "Disabled." means disabled.
"Disabled" means "not for you"? Okay.
> As said, disabled since 3.5.0~rc1-1 because the database tests fail:
>
> [...]
> : && LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/build/buildd-libreoffice_3.5.0~beta3-1-powerpc-DuEdKp/libreoffice-3.5.0~beta3/smoketestoo_native/unxlngppc.pro/lib:/build/buildd-libreoffice_3.5.0~beta3-1-powerpc-DuEdKp/libreoffice-3.5.0~beta3/solver/unxlngppc.pro/lib${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}} /build/buildd-libreoffice_3.5.0~beta3-1-powerpc-DuEdKp/libreoffice-3.5.0~beta3/solver/unxlngppc.pro/bin/cppunit/cppunittester \
> -env:UNO_SERVICES=file:///build/buildd-libreoffice_3.5.0~beta3-1-powerpc-DuEdKp/libreoffice-3.5.0~beta3/solver/unxlngppc.pro/xml/ure/services.rdb \
> -env:UNO_TYPES=file:///build/buildd-libreoffice_3.5.0~beta3-1-powerpc-DuEdKp/libreoffice-3.5.0~beta3/solver/unxlngppc.pro/bin/types.rdb \
> -env:arg-soffice=path:/build/buildd-libreoffice_3.5.0~beta3-1-powerpc-DuEdKp/libreoffice-3.5.0~beta3/solver/unxlngppc.pro/installation/opt/program/soffice -env:arg-user=./unxlngppc.pro/misc/smoketest/user \
> -env:arg-env=LD_LIBRARY_PATH"${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH}" -env:arg-testarg.smoketest.doc=/build/buildd-libreoffice_3.5.0~beta3-1-powerpc-DuEdKp/libreoffice-3.5.0~beta3/solver/unxlngppc.pro/bin/smoketestdoc.sxw --protector \
> /build/buildd-libreoffice_3.5.0~beta3-1-powerpc-DuEdKp/libreoffice-3.5.0~beta3/solver/unxlngppc.pro/lib/unoexceptionprotector.so \
> unoexceptionprotector /build/buildd-libreoffice_3.5.0~beta3-1-powerpc-DuEdKp/libreoffice-3.5.0~beta3/solver/unxlngppc.pro/lib/libsmoketest.so
> smoketest.cxx:212:Assertion
> Test name: (anonymous namespace)::Test::test
> equality assertion failed
> - Expected:
> - Actual : Base:insert(Database Insert record into Database)
>
> Failures !!!
> Run: 1 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors: 0
> dmake: Error code 1, while making 'cpptest'
>
> (See e.g. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=powerpc&ver=1%3A3.5.0~beta3-1&stamp=1326942325. No, no more info. No ppc here)
Useful information. Thank you.
> I could, but as I brought that up before the 3.5 release they didn't care
> that much either. You can try again, of course.
Then please remove wontfix and add upstream at least.
> But frankly speaking, ppc isn't used that much on desktops anyway now but
> more on servers....
Depends on "the measurement system", as always ;) Also, modern
servers, they do have a display, they may want to use LO. I have
nothing against LaTeX, I use it primarily, but sometimes LO is needed.
For example, for Base.
Reply to: