[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#529940: lib32asound2: symbol versioning changed in an incompatible way

tags 529940 pending
forwarded 529940 alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

* Adeodato Simó [090527 13:53 +0200]
> severity 529940 serious
> retitle 529940 lib32asound2: symbol versioning changed in an incompatible way (ALSA_0.9.0rc4/8 dropped)
> thanks
> Hello,
> it seems that between 1.0.19-1 and 1.0.20-1 the list of symbols in
> lib32asound2 changed. More precisely, the list of symbols remained but
> their associated versioning changed: all symbols associated with
> ALSA_0.9.0rc4 and ALSA_0.9.0rc8 were changed to live under ALSA_0.9
> instead, making applications compiled against <= 1.0.19 fail to start
> due to missing symbols.
> Note that this problem affects the 32-bit library in amd64, but not the
> native libraries nor in i386 nor amd64.

Don't we have to verify it at ppc64 as well? CC'd to debian-ppc.

> Also note that we've started having applications like WINE 1.1.19 in
> experimental rebuilt against 1.0.20, and which don't work against
> alsa-lib 1.0.19 either. And we'll have no easy way to detect these,
> since shlibs are not bumped.
> Will you be able to upload fixed packages in a timely manner?

According to [0] I created svn version 2249 on alioth [1]. I've tested
it on amd64, were rc4 symbols appeared by checking via readelf. But
maybe alsa-devel rechecks the buildsystem of alsa-libs to avoid that
dirty hacks? --with-versioned appended to ./configure opts didn't

[0] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2009-April/016083.html
[1] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-alsa/?op=comp&compare[]=%2F@2248&compare[]=%2F@2249

Jordi, please recheck and upload.

Index: debian/rules
--- debian/rules	(Revision 2248)
+++ debian/rules	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
-CFLAGS = -g -Wall
 ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
 	CFLAGS += -O0

  "Talking much about oneself can also 
   be a means to conceal oneself."
         -Friedrich Nietzsche

Reply to: