On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of Lucas Nussbaum told: > On 23/01/08 at 20:35 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 the mental interface of > > Lucas Nussbaum told: > > > > [...] > > > Hi, > > > > > > coreutils 6.10-1 built fine on powerpc, see > > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=6.10-1;arch=powerpc;stamp=1201059579 > > > And I couldn't reproduce the problem by building it manually on > > > bruckner.d.o. Apparently both the buildd and bruckner built with gcc 4.2. > > > > > > Elimar, Bram, could you please try again with coreutils 6.10-1? > > > > I can't find them neither in unstable nor in experimental? > > It is in unstable. You can dget > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/coreutils/coreutils_6.10-1.dsc coreutils: Installed: 5.97-5.7 Candidate: 5.97-5.7 Version table: *** 5.97-5.7 0 990 ftp://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Not synced complete yet. Anyway, the package builds fine: gcc (GCC) 4.2.3 20080114 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-7) but: Now running lintian... W: coreutils source: out-of-date-standards-version 188.8.131.52 (current is 3.7.3) E: coreutils source: build-depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version build-depends: perl-base W: coreutils: package-contains-empty-directory sbin/ W: coreutils: spelling-error-in-news-debian compatability compatibility E: coreutils: preinst-calls-install-info Finished running lintian. This should be æasy to fix. The last changelog entry hst to be reformated as well. Thanks Elimar -- It's a good thing we don't get all the government we pay for.
Description: Digital signature