Re: radeon driver updates for mac laptops
Alex Deucher wrote:
On 9/21/07, Eugen Dedu <Eugen.Dedu@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr> wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:25 +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 15:58 +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote:
VGA-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
If you specify
Option "MacModel" "powerbook"
or "powerbook-duallink", the above should say DVI-0 instead of VGA-0.
However, it prints VGA-0...
Does the log file acknowledge the option being in effect as intended?
Ah...:
((II) RADEON(0): RandR 1.2 enabled, ignore the following RandR disabled
message.
WW) RADEON(0): Option "MacModel" is not used
(--) RandR disabled
I attach the whole log and xorg.conf. Maybe I should try
powerbook-duallink?!
The option value doesn't matter when the driver doesn't recognize the
identifier. Did you get the driver source from upstream GIT and build
it? The option isn't included in xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.7.192 yet.
Hi,
I have just tried xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.7.192-4. Now it works on
my external monitor (Samsung). I have a PowerBook5,2 (4 years old).
I put powerbook-duallink as MacModel.
A few comments:
an output is enabled if there is a * next to one of it's modes.
May I suggest you to write this info in the man page?
snoopy:~$ diff -Naur xrandr.1 xrandr.1-new
--- xrandr.1 2007-09-21 18:16:51.000000000 +0200
+++ xrandr.1-new 2007-09-21 18:23:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -83,7 +83,9 @@
reported while executing the configuration changes.
.IP \-q
When this option is present, or when no configuration changes are
requested,
-xrandr will display the current state of the system.
+xrandr will display the current state of the system. A '*' near a mode
+precises the mode used. A '+' near a mode precises that the corresponding
+output is enabled.
.IP "\-screen \fIsnum\fP"
This option selects which screen to manipulate. Note this refers to the X
screen abstraction, not the monitor (or output).
Also, another comment:
- would it possible to use MacModel XYZ by default, i.e. without
explicitely putting it in xorg.conf? Or is it planned for a future
version of ati driver?
Best regards,
--
Eugen Dedu
Reply to: