Re: Please unban S. Luther from debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
2007/9/3, Francesco Pedrini <francesco.pedrini@gmail.com>:
> On Monday 03 September 2007, Gunther Furtado wrote:
> > 2007/8/30, Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org>:
> > > I object! Please don't lift the ban. After lifting the ban Sven has
> > > clearly shown, that he did not understand why he was banned from
> > > the list and that he is not willing to change his behaviour.
> > >
> > > Gaudenz
> >
> > I second that. I feel, sadly, that Sven Luther is too hurt to see
> > clearly and to find a way to work inside this community.
>
> and, *WHY* Sven Loother is too hurt? FWIW I can see that Sven was
> threated in a way that he doesn't deserve.
>
> As i said in my precedent mail, I don't know Sven, but for what I can
> read in the archives I can't blame Sven for a bad behaviour.
>
> So, to all that say "The reason of the ban is obvious" I reply that *no*
> I can't see a valid reason for *any* of the steps againist him, so
> please be *FAIR* with users (like me) and with Sven and *EXPLAIN* in a
> understandable manner what are the problem with Sven Luther, "the
> reasons are obvious" isn't a good reply.
>
>
Hi,
I am sorry because I believe I wasn't clear: I don't think Sven should
be banned! I don't think debian would be better without him. What I
think is that is impossible to improve the relation between Sven and
the opposite party!
Shortly: I don't think is possible to solve things within Debian.
That is sad and that is bad but that is - IMHO - definitively true.
Cheers,
--
Gunther Furtado
gunzera0@yahoo.com.br
Reply to: