Re: localhost kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
- To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: localhost kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
- From: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 13:54:45 -0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070903165445.GC8233@ime.usp.br>
- In-reply-to: <20070829062212.GA29734@kunpuu.plessy.org>
- References: <20070828031617.GA21819@kunpuu.plessy.org> <20070828155600.GA5971@ime.usp.br> <20070829062212.GA29734@kunpuu.plessy.org>
On Aug 29 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I have installed smartmontools using Fink and the result of the short
> test is :
>
> gslc12|charles|$ smartctl -l selftest /dev/disk0
> smartctl version 5.33 [powerpc-apple-darwin8.10.0] Copyright (C) 2002-4 Bruce Allen
> Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
>
> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
> SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
> Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error
> # 1 Short offline Completed: read failure 60% 4449 2865202
> # 2 Short offline Completed: read failure 60% 4449 2865202
> # 3 Offline Aborted by host 70% 0 -
Hummm, bad result. As I suspected last week, it was something of a
defective drive. :-(
> Is there a risk of damaging further the disk by performing a long
> test?
There is a small possibility, but, in general, I wouldn't say an
incisive yes, as the test may be aborted at the first strange noise that
you hear.
> There is some non-backuped data on this disk, and although I can
> afford losing it, I would prefer not...
Of course losing it is not the preferred way.
> Many thanks for your help,
You are very welcome.
Regards, Rogério Brito.
--
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8
http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito
Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth.debian.org
Reply to: