Re: efficient
Hi Mike, ...
Just to mention, neither aj, nor any of the others who are involved here read
debian-powerpc, so make sure to send it to them. In this case,
leader@debian.org and debian-boot@lists.debian.org are the right place.
Friendly,
Sven Luthe
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:13:59PM -0700, Mike wrote:
> >What's "interesting for Sven" isn't really a consideration, what's
> >reasonable and efficient is. Once this has been tried for some time,
> >I'll be happy to reconsider whether it's effective; if it's going to be
> >dismissed out of hand, though, that indicates a lack of good faith.
>
> I am sorry I had to interject here. The first definition of efficient is
> "Acting directly to produce an effect" <--
> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/efficient
>
> Making Sven jump through hoops to update code that he had or has to work in
> is anything but direct or efficient. Another definition under the
> Thesaurus part of the above page is "being effective without wasting time
> or effort or expense
>
> Now I am not an expert on what happened, and don't claim to be. If you
> don't like him and don't want him, say that, if he screwed up, then it may
> be a competancy problem, and say that, but a group should not hide behind
> an argument of reasonability and efficiency when the whole basis of the
> argument is inefficient
>
> --Mike
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wanadoo vous informe que cet e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail.
> Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
>
>
>
Reply to:
- References:
- efficient
- From: Mike <michael_six@users.sourceforge.net>