Re: therm_adm103x: inquiry
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:49 AM, Cedric Pradalier wrote:
> I'd like to know if there is still people using this module,
I've used it for a while:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/01/msg00453.html
Now i'm living without thermal control.
The logic board of my ibook has been substituted two times, but i don't
know if this is somehow correlated with the lack of thermal control:
my laptop is in the "Repair Extension Program".
> if these users would like to see this module included an
> official kernel
Yes, of course (but, IIRC, BenH didn't like degrees symbol).
> if, knowing that lm_sensors should be able to read this
> chip, you still need the therm_adm103x module (I think so
> since I believe lm_sensor does not provide control over
> the chip, or does it?).
So you can say that therm_adm103x is definitively better than lm_sensors?
> Thanks for you answers.
Thank to you for your work.
luca
--
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers.
-- Leonard Brandwein
http://shammash.homelinux.org/ - http://www.artha.org/shammash/
Reply to: