On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 12:19 +0100, Jochen Voss wrote: > I see that "right control" seems not quite canonical. Oh, I fully agree. Does anyone know a better key code? > But nevertheless, wouldn't it be more flexible to provide > the interpretation of the fn-key in user space (via keyboard > mappings) instead of in the kernel. That was my reasoning when I implemented this. > As a proof of concept you can have a look at the keymaps provided at > my web page http://seehuhn.de/comp/powerbook/ . They provide correct > bindings for the fn key using Johannes' patch. Neat, thanks for maintaining these. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part