[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

g_assert_warning




I've been having this problem for several months now.   Anyone else?

linpmac:~# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  gconf2 gedit-common libgconf2-4 libgtk2.0-bin
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gconf2 gedit-common libgconf2-4 libgtk2.0-bin
0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/3205kB of archives.
After unpacking 12.1MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Selecting previously deselected package libgconf2-4.
(Reading database ... 83858 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libgconf2-4 (from .../libgconf2-4_2.8.1-6_powerpc.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package gconf2.
Unpacking gconf2 (from .../gconf2_2.8.1-6_powerpc.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package gedit-common.
Unpacking gedit-common (from .../gedit-common_2.8.3-4_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libgtk2.0-bin.
Unpacking libgtk2.0-bin (from .../libgtk2.0-bin_2.6.4-3_powerpc.deb) ...
Setting up gedit-common (2.8.3-4) ...

Setting up libgtk2.0-bin (2.6.4-3) ...
Updating the IM modules list for GTK+-2.4.0...Cannot load module /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-xim.so: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-xim.so: undefined symbol: g_assert_warning /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-xim.so does not export GTK+ IM module API: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-xim.so: undefined symbol: g_assert_warning
dpkg: error processing libgtk2.0-bin (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Setting up gconf2 (2.8.1-6) ...

Setting up libgconf2-4 (2.8.1-6) ...

Errors were encountered while processing:
 libgtk2.0-bin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


Fred



Reply to: