Hello Michael, On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:50:02AM -0500, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Why would you assign the return value of a function that returns an int > to a char, be it signed or unsigned? Why do you think I would? I guess the program's author probably did this because the return value is a character (or -1) and it worked on his system. Any data type which can hold the values -1, ..., 127 or so should be fine. All the best, Jochen -- http://seehuhn.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature