Re: TEST: Sleep patch #7
- To: Arne Caspari <arnem@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
- Cc: "debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org" <debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: TEST: Sleep patch #7
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:38:47 +1100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1105583927.27436.5.camel@gaston>
- In-reply-to: <41D26C14.4070001@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
- References: <1102242855.11763.70.camel@gaston> <200412081450.20924.sylvain.joyeux@laas.fr> <41C69E65.7020208@informatik.uni-bremen.de> <1103537405.29032.7.camel@gaston> <41C6A78D.6010905@informatik.uni-bremen.de> <1103538862.30591.10.camel@gaston> <41C6B72D.1080804@informatik.uni-bremen.de> <1103558466.9064.6.camel@gaston> <41C7DA68.7070408@informatik.uni-bremen.de> <1103645564.21770.41.camel@gaston> <41D26C14.4070001@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
> So my configuration is:
>
> iBookG4 800 Mhz running on 600 Mhz, cpufreqd disabled.
> Firewire is enabled ( no devices attached )
> Sound is enabled ( no audio streams open )
> USB is enabled ( no devices attached )
>
> This seems to run rather stable.
>
> So it seems that enabling cpufreqd causes memory corruption when the
> frequency changes.
What are the boot messages displayed by the cpufreq stuff when it's
enabled ? (does it use gpio-based switching or pmu based switching ?)
Ben.
Reply to: