El dom, 01-02-2004 a las 13:46, Sven Luther escribió: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:48:25AM +0100, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote: > > El sáb, 31-01-2004 a las 15:57, Jens Schmalzing escribió: > > > Dear Sven, > > > > > > > I will probably use the -benh tree for future official debian kernels > > > > > > Please keep in mind that kernel-patch-benh exists already. You should > > > at least let it die gracefully if you make it obsolete. Then again, > > > I'm beginning to catch up on my work in general and my Debian stuff in > > > particular (btw, how are the new mol packages doing on pegasos?), so I > > > wouldn't say no if you suggested co-maintainership. > > > > I don't think kernel-patch-benh should be killed, we should use the main > > kernel-source package and apply the needed patches and then compile the > > binaries. Just look at kernel-tree packages, It's used to get the needed > > packages to build an x86 kernel. > > Well, the patches included with it will be part of the > kernel-patch-<vers>-poweprc package. Is there any reason at all to > duplicate them ? Of course not. I misunderstood the mail. Cheers. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther -- Carlos Perelló Marín Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC) Linux Registered User #121232 mailto:carlos@pemas.net || mailto:carlos@gnome.org http://carlos.pemas.net Valencia - Spain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente