Re: Bug#271878: asm/setup.h non-existent #include on ppc
At Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:02:59 -0700,
Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:42:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000,
> > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > > > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> > > > > Stephen R. Marenka <smarenka@debian.org> wrote:
> > > > > > asm/setup.h contains #include <asm-m68k/setup.h>,
> > > > > > which is non-existent on ppc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then what's the problem? I guess you didn't get any problems; if so I
> > > > > close this bug.
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, PPC guys, is it intentional to include asm-m68k/setup.h in
> > > > > /usr/include/asm-ppc/setup.h ? At a glance, we have no need to
> > > > > include this header in setup.h.
> > > >
> > > > This is historically used by the APUS platform, which I think is an m68k
> > > > amiga with a ppc CPU stucked in it, but then, ask Geert, he'll know
> > > > better.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your reply. Geert, is it APUS still alive? If so, I guess
> > > asm-m68k/setup.h is necessary for asm-ppc/setup.h.
> >
> > Yes, AFAIK APUS is still alive.
Cool, thanks Geert.
> Hmmm.. How many of these <asm-ppc/foo.h> #includes <asm-m68k/foo.h> (or
> #else's them in) does glibc (or really, any non-kernel user) need?
> Would someone have the time to try casing all of these inside of #ifdef
> __KERNEL__ ? I've finished doing similar for SH recently (asm/cpu/ and
> asm/mach/ symlinks in this case) and found none of it was really needed.
Exactly, AFAIK, there are no headers to include them.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: