Re: three different sets of daily ISOs -- what's the difference?
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 01:07:46PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sunday, July 11, 2004, at 09:06 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:02:25PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>On Sunday 11 July 2004 10:34, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >>>There are three (seemingly) different sets of daily ISOs at
> >>>
> >>>http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/powerpc/20040710/
> >>>
> >>>http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-
> >>>i/powerpc/20040710/
> >>>
> >>>http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-
> >>>i/powerpc/20040710/
> >>>
> >>>Can anybody explain what the difference is? And which one should I
> >>>use for testing?
>
> >>The daily and sarge_d-i images are identical.
>
> >I never tested, but maybe the business card isos, since they hold all
> >the .udebs, allow also to chose between sid and sarge.
>
> Thanks! Nicolas, Frans and Sven, for the quick answers. I guess
> I'll follow Sven's advice from now on (at least until there's a new
> TC or RC image that needs testing) and use the "sid_d-i"
> businesscard ISOs for testing.
>
> Just one little quibble... The "daily" and "sarge_d-i" images are
> _not_ identical -- at least for 20040710. I haven't downloaded
Sure, daily is sid_d-i since a few days.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: