Re: 2.4 & 2.6 kernels, should sarge be 2.6 only at least for powerpc ?
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:52:40PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:32:43PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > worth noting that no release candidate version of d-i has yet had
> > working support for 2.6 on powerpc (test candidate 1 would have done but
> > ran into a busybox-cvs bug, so it's likely that neither TC2 nor RC1 will
> > have either), although daily builds have had it for some time and in my
> > experience work well.
>
> Huh ? how come daily builds have support while TC2 has not ?
busybox-cvs bug which couldn't get into TC1 because it broke netcfg;
it's too big a change for TC2.
> And as you know, i am actively working on getting the support for it
> right.
As am I.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: