Re: Re : G5 Xserver or Sun Blade 1500

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:48:25AM +0100, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
> El sáb, 31-01-2004 a las 15:57, Jens Schmalzing escribió:
> > Dear Sven,
> > 
> > > I will probably use the -benh tree for future official debian kernels
> > 
> > Please keep in mind that kernel-patch-benh exists already.  You should
> > at least let it die gracefully if you make it obsolete.  Then again,
> > I'm beginning to catch up on my work in general and my Debian stuff in
> > particular (btw, how are the new mol packages doing on pegasos?), so I
> > wouldn't say no if you suggested co-maintainership.
> 
> I don't think kernel-patch-benh should be killed, we should use the main
> kernel-source package and apply the needed patches and then compile the
> binaries. Just look at kernel-tree packages, It's used to get the needed
> packages to build an x86 kernel.

Well, the patches included with it will be part of the
kernel-patch-<vers>-poweprc package. Is there any reason at all to
duplicate them ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther