[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mac53c94.o tainted code !?!? can someone give me somedirections...

>> what this means ??? that mac53c94 uses proprietary/closed-source 
>> code???? is this bad at all?
>mac53c94.c seems to not define MODULE_LICENSE, making it considered as
>proprietary. Perhaps is that a (cosmetic) bug ?

Probably. 2.6 version of this file does define it as GPL.

Ne disez pas disez, mais disez dites

Reply to: