On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:59:35PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:03:01AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > > > You don't look at the bogus /proc/scsi stuff for that, do you? > > > > in current ofpath yes, changing this requires significant rework which > > is not going to happen in the 1.x version of yaboot/ofpath. > > Well, it apears you aren't actually using the devpath: field in > that's exported in the k2 sata driver. Ben, what is actually using that > field? I'll happily adopt all software using it to use the sysfs field > added in my patch below (vs 2.6 mainline): my goal with ofpath 2.0 is a complete rewrite in C, using sysfs as much as possible (if the kernel is in good enough shape i shouldn't even need /proc at all). i haven't decided what to do about 2.2 and 2.4 systems, i may just keep the old sh based ofpath around and exec it on those systems until they are all retired. depends how nasty redoing all the 2.2/2.4 kludges is. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgptVzHbd6H8Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature