[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: php4 package broken



On 18/03/03, Michel D?nzer (daenzer@debian.org) wrote:
> On Die, 2003-03-18 at 15:45, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > On 17/03/03, Internetsnedkeren (gunner@internetsnedkeren.dk) wrote:
> > > > You could also simply try apt-get -t unstable install php4 .

> > > I did just that and it worked fine. (After I had to extend the
> > > cache size for the apt-get).
> > 
> > Sorry, I'm coming in late on this. I'm suffering from a broken testing
> > broken php4, but "apt-get -t unstable install php4" just gives me a list
> > of broken dependencies.
> > 
> > roz:/home/rory# apt-get -t stable install php4
> 
> -t doesn't downgrade, you'll probably have to use a pin with priority
> higher than 1000 to go back to stable.
> 
> If you post the output with -t unstable, we might be able to help. The
> general idea is to add the packages it complains about to the apt-get
> line, see what the real problems are and solve them.

Thanks for the advice, Michael. I'm concerned that if I add the
dependancy files then I'll be caught in a dependancy spiral.

Anyhow, here is output for apt-get -t unstable install -php4:

Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
  php4: Depends: libbz2-1.0 but it is not going to be installed
        Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4) but it is not going to be installed
        Depends: libdb2 (>= 2:2.7.7.0-7) but it is not going to be installed
        Depends: libexpat1 (>= 1.95.2-6) but it is not going to be installed
        Depends: libmm11 but it is not going to be installed
        Depends: libpam0g (>= 0.72-1) but it is not going to be installed
        Depends: libpcre3 but it is not going to be installed
        Depends: zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) but it is not going to be installed
        Depends: apache-common (>= 1.3.26) but it is not going to be installed
        Depends: fileutils (>= 4.0-5)
E: Sorry, broken packages

-- 
Rory Campbell-Lange 
<rory@campbell-lange.net>
<www.campbell-lange.net>



Reply to: