Re: 2.6.0-ben3: Badness in XXX at drivers/char/vt.c:XXX
On 31/12/2003 at 12:02, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> I'm seeing pretty much the same thing. Wasn't happening in -test11.
> I'll compare -ben3 and -test11 to see if something happened to the
> sleep code.
With 2.6.0-ben1 and 2.6.0-ben2 didn't happen either.
> (Another list to report this would be linuxppc-dev, but Ben reads this
> list as well)
Fine. I'm going to lurk there for a while.
On 31/12/2003 at 12:38, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> These are warnings only (see lines 568 and 2851 in vt.c). Seems like
> the wakeup code gives up the console semaphore too early.
I see.
Thanks for the fast replies :-).
Greetings
--
Kiko
Please do not reply to the sender address of this email; due to spam and
Windows (TM) worms, everything not comming from the list is "stored" in
/dev/null. Put menorqui in the user part to send me anything. Although,
I prefer replies sent to the list so that others can benefit from the
discussion. Thanks.
Reply to: