[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xlibs breaking dependencies



Hi Michel

Once again, thanks for your fast answer!!

Am Samstag, 26.07.03, um 00:24 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Michel Dänzer:

On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 00:03, Andreas Wüst wrote:

Am Freitag, 25.07.03, um 23:39 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Michel
Dänzer:

On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 22:50, Andreas Wüst wrote:

I wanted to install some X11 related packages from sid, but they all
have broken dependencies ["( ... ) but it is not going to be
installed"]. So far, so good. When following those dependencies, it
ultimately leads to xlibs, where it reads:

  	xlibs (> 4.2.0) but 4.1.0-16 is to be installed

Huh, I mean, what should that tell me?? If doing an apt-cache policy
xlibs, there is a 4.2.1-9 install candidate, and when checking
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/x/xfree86/ there is
obviously a binary available too. Furthermore, apt-get -u -t unstable
install xlibs doesn't mention any problems.

What is the problem? I am seeing this behaviour an all of my boxen, so
it does not seem to be triggered by strange package combinations et
al.

Hard to tell without seeing exactly what you're doing and the full
output.

Hmm, well, basically I wanted to do

# apt-get -u -t unstable install gnome-session

on one of my boxen (which is running woody ATM). This gets me a list of
broken dependencies, and apt-get quits. Following those deps, I end up
everywhere on said xlibs dependency (which, to be honest, I don't
understand, why does it want to install 4.1.0-16 when it wants a
version greater then 4.2.0 and such a version [4.2.1-9] is even
available?).

Because you have an older version installed, and you don't tell it to
upgrade that.

Sorry, I didn't get this one! I thought, deps would be handled automatically?? If I tell it, for instance, to apt-get -u -t unstable install openoffice.org, apt-get tells me that libc6 etc. (of which I obviously have already an older, i.e. woody, version installed) will be upgraded. So, why does it not do that when trying to install gnome-session?

It works if you add xlibs on the install line, doesn't it?

Of course, it works like that. But I did the exactly same thing 4 weeks ago on another woody box which already had an X environment installed (i.e. incl. xlibs), did an apt-get -u -t unstable install gnome-session, and it automatically pulled in the new xlibs, xbase-clients, xfree86-common etc.

And on both boxes I had set the apt default release to woody.

--
Thanks again, and best wishes,
Andi


Reply to: