Re: 2-4-21-rc3-benh0 - hfsplus
- To: Soeren Sonnenburg <email@example.com>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: 2-4-21-rc3-benh0 - hfsplus
- From: Jens Axboe <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 07:52:22 +0200
- Message-id: <20030612055222.GO17164@suse.de>
- In-reply-to: <1055359799.1070.3.camel@localhost>
- References: <20030529172224.GP845@suse.de> <1054231618.1508.20.camel@localhost> <20030529182934.GV845@suse.de> <1054233789.2591.0.camel@localhost> <20030529185525.GW845@suse.de> <1054244009.2607.2.camel@localhost> <20030530071225.GC845@suse.de> <1054280811.1129.15.camel@localhost> <20030530075639.GH845@suse.de> <1055359799.1070.3.camel@localhost>
On Wed, Jun 11 2003, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0305.3/0096.html :-)
> > Yes, there you go!
> Err, I just now found the time to test it... and now I do wonder whether
> I have to set some hdparm timeout manually (I assume I have to ...)..
> Any reasonable values ?
> For the moment I would allow for hdsleeping for 1hr ... so I am doing
> hdparm -S60 /dev/hda (-S0 respectively) also in the laptop-mode.sh
> script as it makes no sense for me to have the hd beeing powered down
I use -S6 and -S0 on the kernels that don't have the AAM patch. But I
almost always use the laptop-mode patch in conjunction with the AAM
patch, so I don't have a lot of mileage on it alone.