[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: scsi emulation



On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 06:41, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Don, 2002-10-31 at 02:43, bill traynor wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 13:12, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Die, 2002-10-29 at 04:56, bill traynor wrote:
> > > > I'm getting the following errors with kernel 2.4.20-pre11-ben0:
> > > > 
> > > > kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k scsi_hostadapter, errno = 2
> > > > 
> > > > Consequently, I can't mount my DVD/CD-RW on sr0.  I noticed a previous
> > > > thread regarding changes to scsi emulation recently, but I've been
> > > > unable to find a solution.  Is there one?
> > > 
> > > Of course, there always is. :)
> > > 
> > > I created a file /etc/modutils/ide-scsi containing
> > > 
> > > alias scsi_hostadapter ide-scsi
> > > 
> > > and ran update-modules.
> > 
> > OK, I added the latter.  Here's my /etc/modutils/ide-scsi file now:
> > 
> > alias scsi_hostadapter ide-scsi
> > options ide-scsi hdb=ide-scsi
> > 
> > Note, the options line was already in there.
> 
> It's no longer necessary, maybe it even hurts?

Hmm, I just did:

mount -t iso9660 /dev/hdb /cdrom

and I can access the cdrom now.  Is this sufficient to play a DVD, or do
I need to use scsi-emulation?  

> 
> > When I do #mount -t iso9660 /dev/sr0 /cdrom, I get:
> > 
> > mount: /dev/sr0 is not a valid block device.
> > 
> > When I do, cdrecord -scanbus, I get:
> > 
> > cdrecord: No such file or directory. Cannot open 'dev/pg*'. Cannot open
> > SCSI driver.
> 
> I guess it actually tries to access /dev/sg*? Did you access /dev/hdb
> directly before, so the IDE driver may have claimed it before ide-scsi?
> Anything in the kernel output?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
> XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 




Reply to: