Rogério Brito wrote:
Doesn't the actual quik binary just process quik.conf and set up the boot blocks? Like Jens, I don't see why this needs to be statically linked.On Apr 15 2002, Jens Schmalzing wrote:I've been happily using quik for some time, so I'd like to adopt the Debian package. Can anybody give me a reason why the quik binary should be statically linked?Would a dynamically linked quik even work at all? I'd guess "no", since Linux is not running yet with all the infra-structure needed for dynamic linking to work.
The boot blocks themselves are of course "statically linked", but that's another matter.
-- -Adam P. GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! <http://lyre.mit.edu/%7Epowell/The_Best_Stuff_In_The_World_Today_Cafe.ogg>
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org