Re: Trying to use sleepd for inactivity
Michel Lanners (mlan@cpu.lu) wrote:
> > Yeah, I don't know what's up with that. Machine's running fine,
> > though.
>
> Any funny hardware?
None. There's no AirPort cart, there's a big RAM chip in the expansion
slot, and I've a network connection.
> No, PowerPC doesn't have a 15-IRQ limit; PCs have. First-gen PowerMacs
> have 32 IRQs, later models 64 or more... not all of which are used, of
> course.
Aha. Thanks for the clarification.
> that. Apple just chose to do it differently... and often (but not
> always) better than in PCs. Then again, the cruft in PCs is the old
> legacy nobody has gotten rid of....
Sadly, yes. I liked Apple hardware backin the BeOS CHRP days. I
reluctantly followed Be over to x86, but I'm regretting it.
> > Unfortunately, sleepd doesn't do anything remotely like watching
> > /dev/input .
>
> Maybe you need to get your hands dirty...
Agreed. It'd be nice to bring sleepd into the modern age.
I must say, Joey's implementation was virtuously lazy.
-Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: