On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:22:01AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > I'd like feedback on these packages, please, to the debian-x list. > > DRI is for Direct Rendering Infrastructure, not Interface. Whoops. And usually I'm such a stickler for correct terminology. I'll update the template. > It seems you have applied my r128 Xv endianness fix, why don't you mention it > in the changelog? Because I am inconsistent about which ones I'm mentioning. Strictly speaking, I should redescribe all the patches because they've been renumbered, but that strikes me as excessive. > And why don't you apply the Dashed Bresenham fix as well? Because I forgot about it, and don't know where it is. > Also, some kind of patch adding -fPIC for building static libraries will have > to be applied, or a lot of shared libraries will break on powerpc. Gotta build *static* libraries with this flag so *shared* libs won't break...got it. I'll dig around in xc/config/cf/linux.cf and see if there's something I can diddle for that. I'm not sure which would be a greater mark of insanity: wanting to understand why, or not wanting to. > There have been a few posts about the problem to -powerpc (related to > xmms and SDL), and a possible solution is being discussed on > devel@XFree86.Org . Okay, I'll grep through there. > Thanks for your work, Thanks for the feedback! Do you want an xserver-xfree86 debconf question for "UseFBDev"? I only need to ask if [ -d /dev/fb ], correct? -- G. Branden Robinson | Software engineering: that part of Debian GNU/Linux | computer science which is too difficult branden@debian.org | for the computer scientist. http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpt5ZhhTyKQQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature